Merck & Co

Health Portal and Corporate

Health Info Park

Merck.com is a global pharmaceutical entity that can not publish world-wide product information, what once was a problem now is a solution. Health Info Park is a way to publish health information for each therapeutic area (i.e., Heart Disease, Asthma, Hairloss, etc.) Health Info Park turned out to be a credible place for health information.

Corporate Portal

While at Merck in one of my many charges as Managing Editor of merck.com, publishers came to me with a need for a faster, easier way to publish to the web with their rigorous and lengthy approval process. I researched enterprise CMS’s before deciding at that point, we needed a complete re-design merck.com from a static site to a more scalable and interactive site. Also, our current search feature functioned poorly and needed a more relevant usable search feature.



Merck Case Study

Needs:

  • Complete redesign look and feel and make more interactive
  • Scaleable navigation to handle new publishers and expected growth of content
  • Business groups publish to the Internet with CMS
  • Add Health Info Area to support Merck’s therapeutic areas (non-product info)
  • Search feature more relevant and usable

Pain points:

  • 10,000 pages hard-coded navigation
  • Stacked Navigation difficult to use
  • Publishers with conflicting messaging

Concerns:

  • The internet is a fad
  • Security of data
  • Graphics vs. speed of page load

Must Haves:

  • Interactive Features
  • Health Micro Sites
  • Web publishing standards and guidelines

Would Be Nice:

  • Functional and relevant search
  • Verify location to serve relevant content
  • Online community feature

My Role:

  • Research
  • UI Design
  • User Experience methodology


Research: Used advanced sites bloomberg.com, myspace.com, wired.com to pattern ease of use and architecture. Interviewed stakeholders for 2 months (product mgmt, board members, legal, medical, marketing and IT). We were also able to Interview a pool of Doctors and other Health Care Professionals. The consumer interviews were done by outside agency.

Personas: The primary focus is on John Q. Public the consumer, while on professional sites the emphasis is on Dr.’s and Health Care Professionals. This splits the content direction into 2 buckets technical and novice. One of the public personas wanted to also see what the Dr. sees so we added a feature like “read more” to view more technical info on the subject.

Insights: Merck wants to be seen as a caring-wellness and progressive research entity. Business units would like a publishing tool that also tracks the necessary review and approval process. Product wants to publish health topics by therapeutic area. Health Care professionals would like to see a community feature. Users want to have information they can trust and be entertained while being able to recommend to friends and family.

Mapping

Empathy

  • Trust in is not the greatest
  • Information should be accurate and timely
  • Opinions are everywhere

Interactions

  • Intuitive and simple use
  • Works without fail
  • Prompt feed back cues
  • Not gimmicky

Experience

  • Trust in the product and company
  • Accurate timely information
  • New health lesson learned

Journey

  • Open channel for communication
  • Satisfaction with digital interactions
  • Trusted health source


Ideation

  • 3 concepts
  • 1 Proof of concept
  • User testing Hi Fidelity mock ups

Story Boarding-Wire Frames:

  • Learned people desire health info before product info
  • Content is now more credible with professional topics
  • Users don't want to have to click more than 3-5 times for desired information

Design Critique:

  • Progressive colors not typical of big co. feels cutting edge
  • Mixes well with branding and messaging
  • More simplistic navigation verbiage

Prototype/User Testing:

  • Learned bright colors work better
  • Keep consistent top nav don't color break
  • 3d buttons illustrate click-ability

Conclusions: The redesign went smoothly. The content management piece proved the most difficult with customizing the approval process involving legal and medical changes and maybe a sign off. The user testing went well users were generally happy. The individual health sites went well with the normal hiccups. Overall it was a positive experience had by all.

Results:

  • 2.0 Site launched on-time, in 1 year with updates planned every 3 months
  • Business units now have a publishing tool to the Internet
  • Ask Jeeves search much more relevant and useful

Awards:

  • Financial Times: "Best Use of a Company Website"
    • mostly for the About Merck section and the Stock ticker on the home page
  • MMA-In-Awe Awards: Health Info-park
    • mostly for the awesome unbranded health content that was a huge hit